British Airways Wins Tax Appeal on Cabin Crew Accommodation
The airline successfully argued that costs for Heathrow accommodation for cabin crew on back-to-back flights were a deductible travel expense, not a taxable benefit.
The airline successfully argued that costs for Heathrow accommodation for cabin crew on back-to-back flights were a deductible travel expense, not a taxable benefit.
· Updated
British Airways has successfully appealed a tax bill of £5.8 million concerning accommodation provided for its cabin crew at London Heathrow Airport. The airline argued that these costs were essential for crew resting between flights and should be treated as a deductible travel expense.
An appeal heard in June by the Upper Tribunal ruled in favor of British Airways on Monday, dismissing the claim by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). The tribunal found that the accommodation was a necessary expense related to travel for the airline's operations.
New aviation safety regulations introduced in 2016 mandated that cabin crew stay in hotels to rest between consecutive flights. The Tribunal concluded that this accommodation was a "necessarily incurred" cost to meet performance standards tied to their employment duties.
HMRC had contended that the accommodation costs should be classified as 'general earnings,' making them subject to income tax and national insurance contributions. However, the judges stated that the entire flight rotation, including stopovers, constitutes the job and the journey.
An HMRC spokesperson indicated that the department is carefully considering the tribunal's judgment. British Airways expressed satisfaction with the decision, noting that the Upper Tribunal found in their favor.
FAQ
What was the tax dispute between British Airways and HMRC about?
The dispute concerned whether the cost of accommodation for British Airways cabin crew at Heathrow Airport was subject to income tax and national insurance contributions.
Why did the Tribunal rule in favor of British Airways?
The Tribunal ruled that the accommodation was a necessary expense of travel for cabin crew resting between flights, as mandated by aviation safety regulations, and therefore not a taxable employee benefit.
